Back to atlas

country page

Uruguay

Ley Nº 9.739 de 17 de diciembre de 1937 (as amended up to Ley Nº 19.857 of 23 December 2019).

Copyright exception history

0%20%40%60%80%100%199019952000200520102015202020251990: 0%1991: 0%1992: 0%1993: 0%1994: 0%1995: 0%1996: 0%1997: 0%1998: 0%1999: 0%2000: 0%2001: 0%2002: 0%2003: 60%2004: 60%2005: 60%2006: 60%2007: 60%2008: 60%2009: 60%2010: 60%2011: 60%2012: 60%2013: 60%2014: 60%2015: 60%2016: 60%2017: 60%2018: 60%2019: 60%2020: 60%2021: 60%2022: 60%2023: 60%2024: 60%2025: 60%YearOpenness score (%)

Selected year snapshot

For 2025, the active event in this file is Ley Nº 9.739 de 17 de diciembre de 1937 (as amended up to Ley Nº 19.857 of 23 December 2019).

60%

Current rationale

As of 2025, the law in force is Ley 9.739 as amended up to Ley 19.857 of 2019. The most permissive research-relevant exception remains Art. 45, which permits individual reproduction of a full work ('una obra') by a person exclusively for their own use and without profit motive. This covers: (1) Uses: reproduction only (not sharing/communication); (2) Works: all types of works (no category exclusions); (3) Users: individuals only (explicitly excludes enterprise/organizational use for non-personal purposes). Art. 44 permits reproduction of fragments only for research, which is more restrictive (RED). Art. 46 permits free use in the private home, which is similarly restricted to private/personal scope. No TDM-specific exception exists. No fair use or fair dealing clause exists. No library/institutional exception for research copying was identified. No three-step-test general enabling clause exists. The classification is LIGHT BLUE: full-work reproduction is permitted but restricted to private/personal individual use. The non-commercial restriction is classification-neutral per the rules.

Exceptions considered

Art. 440%Research

Reproduction of fragments of works for criticism, commentary, teaching, academic interest or research, provided use is honest and proportionate to the purpose

Art. 4560%Private UseMost permissive

Individual reproduction of a work or fragment, by a person exclusively for own use, without profit motive. Excludes reproduction within enterprises/organizations for non-personal purposes.

Art. 4660%Private Use

Free use of scientific, literary and artistic works in the private home, without profit motive

Law changes

Ley Nº 9.739 de 17 de diciembre de 1937 (Propiedad Literaria y Artística)

Baseline · Effective 1990-01-01

0%

Relevant section: Arts. 44, 45, 46

Dates: Effective 1990-01-01 · Enacted 1937-12-17

Why this score

The baseline law as in force on 1990-01-01 is the original Ley 9.739 of 1937. The key research-relevant exceptions are: Art. 44 (reproduction of 'fragments' for criticism, teaching, academic interest or research — but limited to fragments, not full works); Art. 45 (individual reproduction of a work or fragment for personal use without profit — this could theoretically cover a full work for personal use); and Art. 46 (free use in the private home). However, the text of Art. 44 explicitly limits reproduction to 'fragmentos' (fragments) for research purposes. Art. 45 mentions 'una obra o fragmento de una obra' for personal use, which could permit full-work reproduction for personal use. IMPORTANT NOTE: The text I have verified is the consolidated version as amended by Ley 17.616 of 2003, not the original 1937 text. The original 1937 text of Arts. 44-46 was substantially different and more limited. The original Art. 44 dealt with quotation rights ('citas') and Art. 45 with free performances. The research/private-use exceptions in the form quoted above were introduced by Ley 17.616 in 2003. For the 1990 baseline, the original 1937 provisions were in force, which provided only for quotation (Art. 44 original) and did not contain explicit research or private-use exceptions of the modern form. Under the original 1937 law, the only research-relevant provision was a quotation right limited to fragments/excerpts. This is RED: no provision permitted full-work reproduction for research for any type of work. The ceiling was excerpts/quotations.

Exceptions considered

Art. 44 (original 1937)0%QuotationMost permissive

Right of quotation: permitted reproduction of short passages/fragments for criticism and commentary purposes

Art. 46 (original 1937)0%Private Use

Free use in private home without profit motive — original version dealt with private performance/execution, not reproduction

Original text

English rendering

Source links

Ley Nº 17.616 de 10 de enero de 2003 (Ley de Derecho de Autor y Derechos Conexos)

Relevant update · Effective 2003-01-10

60%

Relevant section: Arts. 44, 45, 46 (as substituted by Ley 17.616)

Dates: Effective 2003-01-10 · Enacted 2003-01-10

Why this score

Ley 17.616 of 2003 substantially reformed the exceptions in Ley 9.739. The new Art. 44 permits reproduction of 'fragments' (fragmentos) for research, academic interest, criticism, commentary, and teaching — but is limited to fragments, not full works, so on its own it would be RED. The new Art. 45 permits 'individual reproduction of a work or fragment of a work' (reproducción individual de una obra o fragmento de una obra) made by a person exclusively for their own use and without profit. This explicitly mentions 'una obra' (a work), meaning full-work reproduction is permitted, but only for personal/individual use (not institutional, not for sharing). Art. 46 permits free use in the private home without profit. Art. 45 is the most permissive exception: it covers reproduction of full works, applies to all types of works, but is restricted to individual/personal use only. It does not authorize sharing or communication. This maps to LIGHT BLUE: full-work reproduction permitted but restricted to private/personal use by individuals. Non-commercial restriction and single-copy implications are classification-neutral. No broader fair dealing, fair use, or general research exception exists that would override this classification.

Exceptions considered

Art. 44 (as amended by Ley 17.616)0%Research

Reproduction of fragments of works for criticism, commentary, teaching, academic interest or research, provided use is honest and proportionate

Art. 45 (as amended by Ley 17.616)60%Private UseMost permissive

Individual reproduction of a work or fragment, by a person exclusively for own use, without profit motive. Not available within enterprises/organizations for non-personal purposes.

Art. 46 (as amended by Ley 17.616)60%Private Use

Free use of works in the private home without profit motive

Original text

English rendering

Source links

Ley Nº 19.857 de 23 de diciembre de 2019 (Rendición de Cuentas y Balance de Ejecución Presupuestal)

Relevant update · Effective 2019-12-23

60%

Relevant section: Arts. 44, 45 (as amended by Ley 19.857)

Dates: Effective 2019-12-23 · Enacted 2019-12-23

Why this score

Ley 19.857 of 23 December 2019 is identified by WIPO Lex as the most recent amendment to Ley 9.739. The WIPO Lex entry references the consolidated text as amended up to Ley 19.857. However, I was unable to retrieve the full text of the specific amendments made by Ley 19.857 to the copyright exceptions via web search. Based on available information, Ley 19.857 was primarily a budget accountability law that included some copyright-related provisions (particularly regarding collective management organizations and enforcement). There is no indication from available sources that it materially changed Arts. 44, 45, or 46 regarding research exceptions. The classification therefore remains LIGHT BLUE based on the continued force of Art. 45 (individual reproduction of a full work for personal use without profit) as the most permissive research-relevant exception. Art. 44 (fragments for research) remains RED on its own. No TDM-specific exception has been introduced.

Exceptions considered

Art. 440%Research

Reproduction of fragments for criticism, commentary, teaching, academic interest or research

Art. 4560%Private UseMost permissive

Individual reproduction of a work or fragment, by a person exclusively for own use, without profit motive

Art. 4660%Private Use

Free use of works in the private home without profit motive

Source links

Ley Nº 9.739 de 17 de diciembre de 1937 (as amended up to Ley Nº 19.857 of 23 December 2019)

Current law confirmation · Effective 2025-01-01

60%

Relevant section: Arts. 44, 45, 46

Dates: Effective 2025-01-01

Why this score

As of 2025, the law in force is Ley 9.739 as amended up to Ley 19.857 of 2019. The most permissive research-relevant exception remains Art. 45, which permits individual reproduction of a full work ('una obra') by a person exclusively for their own use and without profit motive. This covers: (1) Uses: reproduction only (not sharing/communication); (2) Works: all types of works (no category exclusions); (3) Users: individuals only (explicitly excludes enterprise/organizational use for non-personal purposes). Art. 44 permits reproduction of fragments only for research, which is more restrictive (RED). Art. 46 permits free use in the private home, which is similarly restricted to private/personal scope. No TDM-specific exception exists. No fair use or fair dealing clause exists. No library/institutional exception for research copying was identified. No three-step-test general enabling clause exists. The classification is LIGHT BLUE: full-work reproduction is permitted but restricted to private/personal individual use. The non-commercial restriction is classification-neutral per the rules.

Exceptions considered

Art. 440%Research

Reproduction of fragments of works for criticism, commentary, teaching, academic interest or research, provided use is honest and proportionate to the purpose

Art. 4560%Private UseMost permissive

Individual reproduction of a work or fragment, by a person exclusively for own use, without profit motive. Excludes reproduction within enterprises/organizations for non-personal purposes.

Art. 4660%Private Use

Free use of scientific, literary and artistic works in the private home, without profit motive

Original text

English rendering

Source links