Back to atlas

country page

Timor-Leste

Código do Direito de Autor e Direitos Conexos (Code of Copyright and Related Rights).

Copyright exception history

0%20%40%60%80%100%199019952000200520102015202020251990: 0%1991: 0%1992: 0%1993: 0%1994: 0%1995: 0%1996: 0%1997: 0%1998: 0%1999: 0%2000: 0%2001: 0%2002: 0%2003: 0%2004: 0%2005: 0%2006: 0%2007: 0%2008: 0%2009: 0%2010: 0%2011: 0%2012: 0%2013: 0%2014: 0%2015: 0%2016: 0%2017: 0%2018: 0%2019: 0%2020: 0%2021: 0%2022: 0%2023: 80%2024: 80%2025: 80%YearOpenness score (%)

Selected year snapshot

For 2025, the active event in this file is Código do Direito de Autor e Direitos Conexos (Code of Copyright and Related Rights).

80%

Current rationale

As of 2025, the Copyright Code (approved 29 November 2022, in force approximately mid-2023) remains the operative copyright law in Timor-Leste. No amendments to the Copyright Code have been identified via web search. The most permissive exception available to any user for research purposes is Article 77, which permits reproduction and extraction for TDM by any user, for all types of lawfully accessible works. This covers reproduction of full works but does not explicitly cover sharing/communication/distribution. The opt-out mechanism in Art. 77(3) is a classification-neutral factor (it is analogous to a proportionality qualifier). Art. 78 provides TDM for scientific research by research organisations without opt-out, but is restricted to institutions (PURPLE individually). Art. 75(1)(i) permits whole-work reproduction by libraries and scientific institutions (PURPLE). Art. 75(1)(g) permits reproduction, distribution, and making available for scientific research but only of 'short parts' (RED). Art. 76 permits private reproduction but excludes musical scores, whole books available for sale, electronic databases, and computer programs (ORANGE). The overall classification is BLUE: Art. 77 permits reproduction of full works for TDM by any user (all works, all users) but does not cover sharing/communication. No exception provides both full-work reproduction AND sharing for research by any user. Classification-neutral factors (non-commercial restrictions in Art. 78, three-step test in Art. 75(2), lawful access requirement in Art. 77) were not factored into the color decision.

Exceptions considered

Art. 75(1)(a)60%Private Use

Reproduction for exclusively private purposes of a lawfully disclosed work, subject to three-step test

Art. 75(1)(f)0%Quotation

Short quotations or summaries for criticism, discussion, or teaching

Art. 75(1)(g)0%Research

Reproduction, distribution, and making available of short parts for teaching or scientific research

Art. 75(1)(h)0%Research

Inclusion of short parts in one's own work for documentation, teaching, or scientific research

Art. 75(1)(i)40%Library Institutional

Reproduction in whole or in part by libraries, documentation centres, scientific institutions, or educational establishments for their own activities

Art. 7620%Private Use

Private reproduction excluding musical scores, whole books available for sale, electronic databases, and computer programs

Art. 7780%TdmMost permissive

Reproduction and extraction for TDM by any user, all lawfully accessible works, subject to rightholder opt-out; no sharing/communication right

Art. 7840%Tdm

TDM reproduction and extraction for scientific research by research organisations and cultural heritage institutions; no opt-out; contractual override protection

Art. 7940%Educational

Digital use for illustration for teaching by educational establishments

Law changes

Baseline

Baseline · Effective 1990-01-01

0%

Dates: Effective 1990-01-01

Why this score

Timor-Leste was under Indonesian occupation until 1999, then under UN transitional administration (UNTAET) from 1999 to 2002, and became an independent state on 20 May 2002. During the period from 1990-01-01 through at least 2022, Timor-Leste had no dedicated copyright statute. Indonesian copyright law (Law No. 6 of 1982, later replaced by Law No. 19 of 2002) would have applied during the occupation period, and UNTAET Regulation No. 1999/1 provided that laws in force prior to 25 October 1999 would continue to apply insofar as they did not conflict with international standards. However, no verified text of the Indonesian copyright law as applied in East Timor during this period could be retrieved and confirmed as the operative law in the territory. The Constitution of the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (2002) references intellectual property protection in Article 60, but no implementing copyright legislation existed until 2022. Without any copyright statute containing exceptions and limitations, there is effectively no statutory authorization for research copying. The absence of a copyright statute means there is no statutory exception permitting full-work reproduction for research. Classification is RED by default — no statutory exception exists to permit any research-related reproduction of copyrighted works.

Código do Direito de Autor e Direitos Conexos (Code of Copyright and Related Rights)

Relevant update · Effective 2023-06-01

100%

Relevant section: Articles 75, 76, 77, 78, 79

Dates: Effective 2023-06-01 · Enacted 2022-11-29

Why this score

The Copyright Code introduces multiple research-relevant exceptions. The most permissive for research purposes is Article 75(1)(a), which permits reproduction for exclusively private purposes subject to the three-step test, and Article 77, which permits reproduction and extraction for TDM purposes by any user (with an opt-out for rightholders). However, the most clearly GREEN exception is Article 78, which permits research organisations and cultural heritage institutions to carry out reproductions AND extractions for TDM for scientific research, with contractual override protection and no opt-out. Additionally, Article 75(1)(g) permits reproduction, distribution, and making available to the public of short parts for teaching or scientific research. Article 75(1)(i) permits reproduction in whole or in part by libraries, documentation centres, scientific institutions, or educational establishments for their own activities. Critically, Article 77 permits TDM (reproduction and extraction) by any user for any purpose, covering all works, though subject to rightholder opt-out. This is a broad exception covering reproduction for any user and any work. While the opt-out mechanism in Art. 77(3) could limit its scope, the exception as written covers reproduction and extraction (which includes making available the results) for TDM by any user. Combined with Art. 75(1)(g) which covers reproduction, distribution, and making available for scientific research (though limited to short parts), and Art. 75(1)(i) which covers whole-work reproduction by institutions, the overall framework is GREEN. The classification is GREEN because Art. 77 covers reproduction and extraction for TDM by any user for any work (subject to opt-out), and Art. 78 covers TDM reproduction and extraction for scientific research by research organisations without opt-out. Art. 75(1)(i) permits whole-work institutional reproduction. The combination of these provisions — particularly Art. 77's broad TDM exception covering reproduction by any user — supports GREEN classification. Non-commercial restrictions (Art. 78) and proportionality qualifiers (Art. 75(2)) are classification-neutral factors.

Exceptions considered

Art. 75(1)(a)60%Private Use

Reproduction for exclusively private purposes of a lawfully disclosed work, subject to three-step test

Art. 75(1)(f)0%Quotation

Short quotations or summaries in support of one's own doctrines or for criticism, discussion, or teaching

Art. 75(1)(g)0%Research

Reproduction, distribution, and making available to the public of short parts of a published work for teaching or scientific research

Art. 75(1)(h)0%Research

Inclusion of short parts of works of others in one's own work for documentation, teaching, or scientific research

Art. 75(1)(i)40%Library Institutional

Reproduction in whole or in part by libraries, documentation centres, scientific institutions, or educational establishments, limited to needs of their own activities

Art. 7620%Private Use

Reproduction for exclusively private use, no commercial purpose; excludes musical scores, whole books available for sale, electronic databases, computer programs

Art. 7780%TdmMost permissive

Reproduction and extraction for TDM purposes by any user, for any works lawfully accessible; subject to rightholder opt-out

Art. 7840%Tdm

TDM reproduction and extraction for scientific research by research organisations and cultural heritage institutions; no opt-out; contractual override protection

Art. 7940%Educational

Digital use of works for illustration for teaching by educational establishments

Original text

English rendering

Source links

Código do Direito de Autor e Direitos Conexos (Code of Copyright and Related Rights)

Current law confirmation · Effective 2023-06-01

80%

Relevant section: Articles 75, 76, 77, 78, 79

Dates: Effective 2023-06-01 · Enacted 2022-11-29

Why this score

As of 2025, the Copyright Code (approved 29 November 2022, in force approximately mid-2023) remains the operative copyright law in Timor-Leste. No amendments to the Copyright Code have been identified via web search. The most permissive exception available to any user for research purposes is Article 77, which permits reproduction and extraction for TDM by any user, for all types of lawfully accessible works. This covers reproduction of full works but does not explicitly cover sharing/communication/distribution. The opt-out mechanism in Art. 77(3) is a classification-neutral factor (it is analogous to a proportionality qualifier). Art. 78 provides TDM for scientific research by research organisations without opt-out, but is restricted to institutions (PURPLE individually). Art. 75(1)(i) permits whole-work reproduction by libraries and scientific institutions (PURPLE). Art. 75(1)(g) permits reproduction, distribution, and making available for scientific research but only of 'short parts' (RED). Art. 76 permits private reproduction but excludes musical scores, whole books available for sale, electronic databases, and computer programs (ORANGE). The overall classification is BLUE: Art. 77 permits reproduction of full works for TDM by any user (all works, all users) but does not cover sharing/communication. No exception provides both full-work reproduction AND sharing for research by any user. Classification-neutral factors (non-commercial restrictions in Art. 78, three-step test in Art. 75(2), lawful access requirement in Art. 77) were not factored into the color decision.

Exceptions considered

Art. 75(1)(a)60%Private Use

Reproduction for exclusively private purposes of a lawfully disclosed work, subject to three-step test

Art. 75(1)(f)0%Quotation

Short quotations or summaries for criticism, discussion, or teaching

Art. 75(1)(g)0%Research

Reproduction, distribution, and making available of short parts for teaching or scientific research

Art. 75(1)(h)0%Research

Inclusion of short parts in one's own work for documentation, teaching, or scientific research

Art. 75(1)(i)40%Library Institutional

Reproduction in whole or in part by libraries, documentation centres, scientific institutions, or educational establishments for their own activities

Art. 7620%Private Use

Private reproduction excluding musical scores, whole books available for sale, electronic databases, and computer programs

Art. 7780%TdmMost permissive

Reproduction and extraction for TDM by any user, all lawfully accessible works, subject to rightholder opt-out; no sharing/communication right

Art. 7840%Tdm

TDM reproduction and extraction for scientific research by research organisations and cultural heritage institutions; no opt-out; contractual override protection

Art. 7940%Educational

Digital use for illustration for teaching by educational establishments

Original text

English rendering

Source links