Back to atlas

country page

Peru

Decreto Legislativo Nº 822 - Ley sobre el Derecho de Autor (as amended).

Copyright exception history

0%20%40%60%80%100%199019952000200520102015202020251996: 0%1997: 0%1998: 0%1999: 0%2000: 0%2001: 0%2002: 0%2003: 0%2004: 0%2005: 0%2006: 0%2007: 0%2008: 0%2009: 0%2010: 0%2011: 0%2012: 0%2013: 0%2014: 0%2015: 0%2016: 0%2017: 0%2018: 0%2019: 0%2020: 0%2021: 0%2022: 0%2023: 0%2024: 0%2025: 0%YearOpenness score (%)

Selected year snapshot

For 2025, the active event in this file is Decreto Legislativo Nº 822 - Ley sobre el Derecho de Autor (as amended).

0%

Current rationale

As of 2025, Peru's copyright law remains Decreto Legislativo 822 of 1996. No amendments have been identified via web search that modified the exceptions and limitations provisions (Articles 41-50) in a manner relevant to research, private study, fair use, fair dealing, or TDM. Peru has not enacted a TDM exception. There is no general fair use or fair dealing clause. The most permissive exceptions for research remain: (1) Art. 50 — personal use reproduction limited to 'small parts' of in-print works (or full reproduction of out-of-print works only); (2) Art. 43(b) — reprographic reproduction of 'brief extracts' for exclusive personal use. Neither permits full-work reproduction of in-print works. Art. 49 permits library reproduction only for preservation/replacement purposes, not for research supply. Art. 44 permits quotation only. No exception covers sharing/communication for research. No exception is open to all users for full-work reproduction of in-print works. The ceiling for research use of in-print works remains excerpts/small parts, which maps to RED. Classification-neutral factors (non-commercial restriction, single-copy limits) were not factored into the color decision.

Exceptions considered

Art. 43(a)0%Educational

Reprographic reproduction for teaching or exams in educational institutions, of articles or brief extracts, non-profit, fair practice

Art. 43(b)0%Private Use

Reprographic reproduction for exclusive use of the person making it, of brief extracts of lawfully published works, isolated, no available license

Art. 440%Quotation

Quotation of a lawfully disclosed work, with attribution, fair practice, justified by purpose

Art. 4660%Private Use

Recording of lectures at universities/institutes/schools by attendees for personal use

Art. 4880%Other

Reproduction for judicial or administrative proceedings, justified by purpose

Art. 4940%Library Institutional

Library/archive reproduction for preservation or replacement of lost/destroyed copies only

Art. 500%Private UseMost permissive

Personal use reproduction limited to small parts of protected works or out-of-print works; not by photocopying businesses

Art. 410%Other

Communication in domestic sphere, official acts, or didactic purposes in educational institutions

Law changes

Ley 13714 - Ley de Derecho de Autor

Baseline · Effective 1961-11-16

?

Dates: Effective 1961-11-16 · Enacted 1961-10-11

Why this score

Peru's copyright law in force on 1990-01-01 was Ley 13714 of 1961 (Ley de Derecho de Autor). Despite extensive web searching, the full statutory text of Ley 13714 could not be located or verified online. No digitized version of the original text was found on official Peruvian government sites, WIPO Lex, or other permitted sources. Without access to the actual text of the exceptions and limitations provisions, the classification cannot be determined with confidence. The law was superseded by Decreto Legislativo 822 in 1996.

Decreto Legislativo Nº 822 - Ley sobre el Derecho de Autor

Relevant update · Effective 1996-04-24

0%

Relevant section: Art. 41, Art. 42, Art. 43, Art. 44, Art. 45, Art. 46, Art. 47, Art. 48, Art. 49, Art. 50

Dates: Effective 1996-04-24 · Enacted 1996-04-23

Why this score

Decreto Legislativo 822 replaced Ley 13714 as Peru's copyright law. Evaluating all exceptions relevant to research: (1) Art. 43(a) permits reprographic reproduction for teaching/exams of 'articles or brief extracts' — limited to excerpts, not full works, and limited to educational institutions. (2) Art. 43(b) permits reprographic reproduction for exclusive use of the person making it, but only of 'brief extracts' (breves extractos). (3) Art. 50 permits reproduction for personal use of the copier, but limited to 'small parts of a protected work' (pequeñas partes) or out-of-print works. For in-print works, this is limited to small parts only. (4) Art. 44 permits quotation only. (5) Art. 49 permits library reproduction only for preservation/replacement, not for research. (6) Art. 41 permits communication only in domestic sphere, official acts, or didactic purposes in educational institutions — none of these are general research exceptions. (7) Art. 46 permits recording of lectures for personal use. (8) Art. 48 permits reproduction for judicial/administrative proceedings. None of these exceptions permit reproduction of full works for research purposes (except Art. 50 for out-of-print works, which is a narrow case). The ceiling for in-print works is 'small parts' or 'brief extracts.' There is no fair use, fair dealing, or general research exception. There is no TDM exception. The most permissive exception for research involving in-print works is Art. 50 (personal use limited to small parts) or Art. 43(b) (brief extracts for exclusive personal use). Both cap reproduction at excerpts/small parts. Art. 50 does allow full reproduction of out-of-print works, but this is a very narrow category. For the general case of research involving in-print works, the ceiling is small parts/brief extracts, which maps to RED. The non-commercial restriction in Art. 43 and the single-copy nature of Art. 50 are classification-neutral factors. Note: Art. 50 for out-of-print works could arguably support LIGHT BLUE for that narrow category, but since the general rule for in-print works is small parts only, RED is the appropriate classification.

Exceptions considered

Art. 43(a)0%Educational

Reprographic reproduction for teaching or exams in educational institutions, of articles or brief extracts of lawfully published works, non-profit, fair practice

Art. 43(b)0%Private Use

Reprographic reproduction for exclusive use of the person making it, of brief extracts of lawfully published works, isolated reproduction, no available license

Art. 440%Quotation

Quotation of a lawfully disclosed work, with source and author attribution, in accordance with fair practice and justified by purpose

Art. 4660%Private Use

Recording of lectures at universities, higher institutes and schools by those to whom they are addressed, for personal use

Art. 4880%Other

Reproduction of a work for judicial or administrative proceedings, to the extent justified by the purpose

Art. 4940%Library Institutional

Individual reproduction by public libraries or archives (non-profit) for preservation or replacement of lost/destroyed copies in permanent collection

Art. 500%Private UseMost permissive

Reproduction for personal use of the copier, limited to small parts of a protected work or out-of-print works; not by photocopying businesses

Art. 410%Other

Communication in domestic sphere, official acts, or didactic purposes in educational institutions — not a general research exception

Original text

English rendering

Source links

Decreto Legislativo Nº 822 - Ley sobre el Derecho de Autor (as amended)

Current law confirmation · Effective 2025-01-01

0%

Relevant section: Art. 41, Art. 43, Art. 44, Art. 46, Art. 48, Art. 49, Art. 50

Dates: Effective 2025-01-01

Why this score

As of 2025, Peru's copyright law remains Decreto Legislativo 822 of 1996. No amendments have been identified via web search that modified the exceptions and limitations provisions (Articles 41-50) in a manner relevant to research, private study, fair use, fair dealing, or TDM. Peru has not enacted a TDM exception. There is no general fair use or fair dealing clause. The most permissive exceptions for research remain: (1) Art. 50 — personal use reproduction limited to 'small parts' of in-print works (or full reproduction of out-of-print works only); (2) Art. 43(b) — reprographic reproduction of 'brief extracts' for exclusive personal use. Neither permits full-work reproduction of in-print works. Art. 49 permits library reproduction only for preservation/replacement purposes, not for research supply. Art. 44 permits quotation only. No exception covers sharing/communication for research. No exception is open to all users for full-work reproduction of in-print works. The ceiling for research use of in-print works remains excerpts/small parts, which maps to RED. Classification-neutral factors (non-commercial restriction, single-copy limits) were not factored into the color decision.

Exceptions considered

Art. 43(a)0%Educational

Reprographic reproduction for teaching or exams in educational institutions, of articles or brief extracts, non-profit, fair practice

Art. 43(b)0%Private Use

Reprographic reproduction for exclusive use of the person making it, of brief extracts of lawfully published works, isolated, no available license

Art. 440%Quotation

Quotation of a lawfully disclosed work, with attribution, fair practice, justified by purpose

Art. 4660%Private Use

Recording of lectures at universities/institutes/schools by attendees for personal use

Art. 4880%Other

Reproduction for judicial or administrative proceedings, justified by purpose

Art. 4940%Library Institutional

Library/archive reproduction for preservation or replacement of lost/destroyed copies only

Art. 500%Private UseMost permissive

Personal use reproduction limited to small parts of protected works or out-of-print works; not by photocopying businesses

Art. 410%Other

Communication in domestic sphere, official acts, or didactic purposes in educational institutions

Original text

English rendering

Source links