Back to atlas

country page

Canada

Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42 (as amended, current to 2025).

Copyright exception history

0%20%40%60%80%100%199019952000200520102015202020251990: 100%1991: 100%1992: 100%1993: 100%1994: 100%1995: 100%1996: 100%1997: 100%1998: 100%1999: 100%2000: 100%2001: 100%2002: 100%2003: 100%2004: 100%2005: 100%2006: 100%2007: 100%2008: 100%2009: 100%2010: 100%2011: 100%2012: 100%2013: 100%2014: 100%2015: 100%2016: 100%2017: 100%2018: 100%2019: 100%2020: 100%2021: 100%2022: 100%2023: 100%2024: 100%2025: 100%YearOpenness score (%)

Selected year snapshot

For 2025, the active event in this file is Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42 (as amended, current to 2025).

100%

Current rationale

As of 2025, the Copyright Act of Canada continues to contain the same fair dealing provision in s. 29 that was last amended in 2012. 'Fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright.' This remains the most permissive research-relevant exception. Analysis: (1) Uses: 'dealing' covers any exclusive right โ€” reproduction, communication, distribution, performance, etc. (2) Works: applies to any 'work or other subject-matter' โ€” no category of works is excluded. (3) Users: open to any person โ€” not restricted to institutions or individuals acting privately. 'Research' and 'private study' are listed as independent purposes separated by commas; 'private' modifies 'study' only, not 'research.' This satisfies GREEN: full-work reproduction AND sharing/communication permitted, for research, by any user, for any work. No TDM-specific exception has been enacted in Canada as of 2025, but the general fair dealing for research in s. 29 would cover TDM activities to the extent they constitute fair dealing. Other exceptions remain in force: library/archive/museum exceptions (ss. 30.1โ€“30.2, PURPLE), educational institution exceptions (ss. 29.4โ€“30.04, PURPLE), reproduction for private purposes (s. 29.22, LIGHT BLUE), user-generated content (s. 29.21), and temporary reproductions for technological processes (s. 30.71). None of these is more permissive than s. 29. Classification-neutral factors (proportionality inherent in 'fair dealing,' non-commercial restrictions in other provisions) were not used to change the color. The last amendment to the Copyright Act was on April 27, 2023 (relating to term extension to life+70 under the CUSMA implementation), which did not affect the exceptions provisions.

Exceptions considered

Section 29100%Fair DealingMost permissive

Fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright. Covers any dealing with any work by any user.

Section 29.1100%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review, with attribution.

Section 29.2100%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing for the purpose of news reporting, with attribution.

Section 29.21100%Other

Non-commercial user-generated content exception. Individual may use existing work in creation of new work and disseminate it, non-commercial purposes only.

Section 29.2260%Private Use

Reproduction for private purposes by an individual from a legally obtained, non-infringing copy.

Section 29.2360%Private Use

Time-shifting exception for individuals recording broadcast programs for later private viewing/listening.

Section 29.2460%Other

Backup copies exception. Person who owns a copy may make a backup copy.

Sections 29.4โ€“30.0440%Educational

Educational institution exceptions: performances in classroom (s. 29.5), reproductions for tests (s. 29.4), Internet-available works for educational purposes (s. 30.04), etc. Restricted to educational institutions.

Sections 30.1โ€“30.240%Library Institutional

Library, archive, and museum exceptions. Permits reproduction for patrons for research or private study (s. 30.2), inter-library loans (s. 30.2(2)), reproduction of unpublished works (s. 30.21), etc. Restricted to LAM institutions.

Section 30.71100%Other

Temporary reproductions for technological processes. Not an infringement to make a temporary reproduction if it is an essential part of a technological process and has no independent economic significance.

Law changes

Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42

Baseline ยท Effective 1990-01-01

100%

Relevant section: Section 29

Dates: Effective 1990-01-01

Why this score

Section 29 of the Copyright Act as in force on 1990-01-01 provided a fair dealing exception for the purpose of 'research or private study.' The term 'dealing' is not limited to reproduction โ€” it covers any act restricted by copyright, including reproduction, communication, and other exclusive rights. It applies to any user (not restricted to institutions or individuals acting privately โ€” 'private study' is one of two independent purposes alongside 'research'). It applies to all types of works. There is no statutory cap on the amount that may be dealt with. This satisfies GREEN: reproduction of full works AND sharing/communication, for research purposes, open to any user and any work. The library exception in s. 30.1โ€“30.2 (permitting libraries to make copies for patrons for research/private study) also existed but is less permissive (PURPLE). Classification-neutral factors (non-commercial purpose, proportionality inherent in 'fair dealing') were not used to change the color.

Exceptions considered

Section 29100%Fair DealingMost permissive

Fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study does not infringe copyright. Covers any dealing (any exclusive right) with any work by any user.

Section 27(2)(a) (pre-1997 numbering for library provisions)40%Library Institutional

Library and archive exceptions permitting reproduction of works for patrons for research or private study, subject to conditions.

Original text

Source links

Copyright Act, as amended by S.C. 1997, c. 24 (An Act to amend the Copyright Act)

Relevant update ยท Effective 1997-09-01

100%

Relevant section: Sections 29, 29.1, 29.2, 30.1, 30.2

Dates: Effective 1997-09-01 ยท Enacted 1997-04-25

Why this score

The 1997 amendments restructured the exceptions Part III of the Copyright Act. Section 29 (fair dealing for research or private study) was retained unchanged. New fair dealing purposes were added (criticism/review in s. 29.1, news reporting in s. 29.2). New library/archive/museum exceptions were enacted in ss. 30.1โ€“30.2, permitting these institutions to make copies for patrons for research or private study. The most permissive exception remains s. 29 fair dealing for research or private study, which is GREEN for the same reasons as the baseline: 'dealing' covers any exclusive right, applies to any user, any work, with no statutory quantity cap. The library exceptions (PURPLE) are less permissive. Classification-neutral factors not used.

Exceptions considered

Section 29100%Fair DealingMost permissive

Fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study does not infringe copyright. Covers any dealing with any work by any user.

Section 29.1100%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review, with attribution requirements.

Section 29.2100%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing for the purpose of news reporting, with attribution requirements.

Sections 30.1โ€“30.240%Library Institutional

Library, archive, and museum exceptions permitting reproduction for patrons for research or private study, subject to conditions (e.g., single copy, cannot reasonably be obtained commercially).

Sections 29.4โ€“30.0440%Educational

Educational institution exceptions for performances, reproductions for tests/examinations, and related educational uses.

Original text

Source links

Copyright Modernization Act, S.C. 2012, c. 20

Relevant update ยท Effective 2012-11-07

100%

Relevant section: Sections 29, 29.1, 29.2, 29.21, 29.22, 29.23, 29.24, 30.04

Dates: Effective 2012-11-07 ยท Enacted 2012-06-29

Why this score

The Copyright Modernization Act (Bill C-11) significantly expanded the exceptions in the Copyright Act. Most importantly for research: (1) Section 29 was broadened to add 'education, parody or satire' as additional fair dealing purposes alongside the pre-existing 'research' and 'private study.' The core research/private study fair dealing remained unchanged and continues to be GREEN. (2) New s. 29.21 created a user-generated content exception. (3) New s. 29.22 created a reproduction for private purposes exception (individual only, LIGHT BLUE). (4) New s. 29.23 created a time-shifting exception. (5) New s. 29.24 created a backup copies exception. (6) New s. 30.04 created an Internet-available works exception for educational institutions. (7) New s. 30.71 created a temporary reproductions for technological processes exception. (8) New s. 31.1 created a network services safe harbour. The most permissive exception for research remains s. 29 fair dealing for research or private study: 'dealing' covers any exclusive right, applies to any user, any work, no quantity cap. GREEN is maintained. Classification-neutral factors (non-commercial restriction in s. 29.21, proportionality in fair dealing) not used to change color.

Exceptions considered

Section 29100%Fair DealingMost permissive

Fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright. Now includes 'education' as an additional purpose. Covers any dealing with any work by any user.

Section 29.1100%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review, with attribution.

Section 29.2100%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing for the purpose of news reporting, with attribution.

Section 29.21100%Other

Non-commercial user-generated content exception. Permits individual to use existing work in creation of new work and disseminate it, for non-commercial purposes.

Section 29.2260%Private Use

Reproduction for private purposes. Individual may reproduce a work from a non-infringing, legally obtained copy for private purposes. Restricted to individuals.

Section 30.0440%Educational

Educational institution Internet exception. Permits educational institutions to reproduce, communicate, and perform works available on the Internet for educational purposes, subject to conditions (no TPM, no visible prohibition notice, source attribution).

Sections 30.1โ€“30.240%Library Institutional

Library, archive, and museum exceptions for reproduction for patrons for research or private study.

Section 30.71100%Other

Temporary reproductions for technological processes. Permits temporary reproductions that are an essential part of a technological process.

Original text

English rendering

Source links

Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42 (as amended, current to 2025)

Current law confirmation ยท Effective 2023-04-27

100%

Relevant section: Section 29

Dates: Effective 2023-04-27

Why this score

As of 2025, the Copyright Act of Canada continues to contain the same fair dealing provision in s. 29 that was last amended in 2012. 'Fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright.' This remains the most permissive research-relevant exception. Analysis: (1) Uses: 'dealing' covers any exclusive right โ€” reproduction, communication, distribution, performance, etc. (2) Works: applies to any 'work or other subject-matter' โ€” no category of works is excluded. (3) Users: open to any person โ€” not restricted to institutions or individuals acting privately. 'Research' and 'private study' are listed as independent purposes separated by commas; 'private' modifies 'study' only, not 'research.' This satisfies GREEN: full-work reproduction AND sharing/communication permitted, for research, by any user, for any work. No TDM-specific exception has been enacted in Canada as of 2025, but the general fair dealing for research in s. 29 would cover TDM activities to the extent they constitute fair dealing. Other exceptions remain in force: library/archive/museum exceptions (ss. 30.1โ€“30.2, PURPLE), educational institution exceptions (ss. 29.4โ€“30.04, PURPLE), reproduction for private purposes (s. 29.22, LIGHT BLUE), user-generated content (s. 29.21), and temporary reproductions for technological processes (s. 30.71). None of these is more permissive than s. 29. Classification-neutral factors (proportionality inherent in 'fair dealing,' non-commercial restrictions in other provisions) were not used to change the color. The last amendment to the Copyright Act was on April 27, 2023 (relating to term extension to life+70 under the CUSMA implementation), which did not affect the exceptions provisions.

Exceptions considered

Section 29100%Fair DealingMost permissive

Fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright. Covers any dealing with any work by any user.

Section 29.1100%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review, with attribution.

Section 29.2100%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing for the purpose of news reporting, with attribution.

Section 29.21100%Other

Non-commercial user-generated content exception. Individual may use existing work in creation of new work and disseminate it, non-commercial purposes only.

Section 29.2260%Private Use

Reproduction for private purposes by an individual from a legally obtained, non-infringing copy.

Section 29.2360%Private Use

Time-shifting exception for individuals recording broadcast programs for later private viewing/listening.

Section 29.2460%Other

Backup copies exception. Person who owns a copy may make a backup copy.

Sections 29.4โ€“30.0440%Educational

Educational institution exceptions: performances in classroom (s. 29.5), reproductions for tests (s. 29.4), Internet-available works for educational purposes (s. 30.04), etc. Restricted to educational institutions.

Sections 30.1โ€“30.240%Library Institutional

Library, archive, and museum exceptions. Permits reproduction for patrons for research or private study (s. 30.2), inter-library loans (s. 30.2(2)), reproduction of unpublished works (s. 30.21), etc. Restricted to LAM institutions.

Section 30.71100%Other

Temporary reproductions for technological processes. Not an infringement to make a temporary reproduction if it is an essential part of a technological process and has no independent economic significance.

Original text

Source links